Someone gave me a CD of Charles Avison’s music (1709 -1770) Whilst listening, the label “lightweight” came to mind. The music is pleasant enough, easy to listen to, and that reminded me of a contemporary of Avisons’ – Johann Stamitz – whos music I found to be similar in it’s easy listening quality. http://jimsclassicalmusic.com/2010/03/14/easy-listening/
So what is it that separates these two from the likes of Handel, Rameau, Telemann and of course JS Bach? Not enough notes?! Uninteresting interaction between themes/melodies? For want of a better word (remember I’m only a classical music dilettante, not a real critic) I would call their music shallow … or ‘thin’
Here’s Avison’s concerto in A major opus 4
To do your own listening comparison you can scroll through the composer drop down menu on the right and listen to some Handel et. al. Actually part of the reason I made this post was to get back at Avison for being critcal of Handel! How dare he!